Wednesday, December 9, 2009

The Obama - Rogers White House Affair ?




*** Breaking News - Up Date on This Story

OK, we are now into the 11th month of “democrat” President Barack Obama’s first and hopefully last term. Being the democrat that he is, we should all be asking the very obvious question, “who’s he doing?” Sorry for being so crass in referring to the President of the United States but history proves that if you have a democrat in office, odds are he’s doing somebody other than his wife.
I hate bringing Tiger Woods into this but see what I mean! Many marvel at how Tiger managed over 10 mistresses and still had time for a wife, kids and win major golf tournaments. One could say the same for the President. Squeaky clean means, organized that's all, not moral.
With that said one has to ask why Desiree Rogers the White House social secretary took her secretary’s hat off and attended, “as a guest” the state dinner for the Prime Minister of India last week.
Could it be jealousy? Could it be her ego? Ego, maybe, but being a women I’d put my money on jealousy. How many times have we seen and heard of that jealous female lover crashing the party or gathering where the married lover is accompanied by his unsuspecting wife. Like a million times, right?
Than we have the White House exercising the separation of powers doctrine by refusing to let Rogers testify before the House Homeland Security Committee in regards to the State dinner gatecrasher flap.
This is like nuking a country the size of Lichtenstein. Why, would the White House slam the gates on Rogers so hard, if they weren't afraid of her spilling the beans of her affair with the President? It all looks a little fishy to me and should too you.
Also, to be perfectly honest with you I have never seen much warmth in Michelle towards her man. Her body language looks more like indifference than love and affection.
How convenient for the President to have his divorced mistress from Chicago in the White House. Do we have another Monica slinking around the Oval Office again? It sure looks like it!



***
By the way, I just received this picture from one of my operatives with Obama and the party crashers taken two years ago while he was a Senator. They know each other and have known each other for years and it looks like the White House may have used them as a smoke screen to hide an incident that may have happened between Obama and Rogers the night of the dinner. Notice the man to the far left, can you guess who he is? Hint, he's a Czar. That's right Mark Lloyd the radical that's running the FCC. The guy that wants to shut down conservative talk radio.





11 comments:

  1. Brian Ross and Matt Hosford broke the story for ABC News:


    In a massive security breach, the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) inadvertently posted online its airport screening procedures manual, including some of the most closely guarded secrets regarding special rules for diplomats and CIA and law enforcement officers.

    The most sensitive parts of the 93-page Standard Operating Procedures manual were apparently redacted in a way that computer savvy individuals easily overcame.
    The document shows sample CIA, Congressional and law enforcement credentials which experts say would make it easy for terrorists to duplicate.

    The improperly redacted areas indicate that only 20 percent of checked bags are to be hand searched for explosives and reveal in detail the limitations of x-ray screening machines.


    [...]

    "This manual provides a road map to those who would do us harm," said Collins. "The detailed information could help terrorists evade airport security measures." Collins said she intended to ask the Department of Homeland Security how the breach happened, and "how it will remedy the damage that has already been done."

    [...]


    The document contains a list of items for which screening is not required including wheelchairs, footwear of disabled individuals, casts and orthopedic shoes.

    The redacted portions also indicate which law enforcement personnel are specially screened or exempt from some screening procedures, and indicate what requirements they must meet to be eligible for special screening.

    ReplyDelete
  2. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wF2C235fD7o

    ReplyDelete
  3. Michelle's personality and facial features are too strong to represent a subtle image like the ones of Desiree.

    I always joked that Michelle looks like a "dominatrix in drag" .Pr have tried to soften her looks, gestures and words but they can't perform miracles. She may have born with relative intelligence but nature was not grateful with her looks. As we know "You can take the girl out of the Honky Tonk but can't take the Honky Tonk out of the girl".

    Definitively, WH is protecting Desire. Reasons may never be known because this progressive, fascist groups are masters of deception.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Interesting photo. Mrs. Party Crasher looks like 10 miles of bad road.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Not surprising, everything is a scam with Brokeback Oblowhard.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I wouldn't lay any bets on that picture being authentic. It has probably been altered or superimposed with another.

    ReplyDelete
  7. If you take a close look at the picture, everyone's looking at the camera except Obama and that little bushy headed dude 2nd in from the left. The picture's been doctored if you ask me.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Um...that guy to the far left is Randy Jackson from American Idol. He looks like Mark Lloyd, maybe, but it's Jackson. Also, that is the Black Eyed Peas in the picture as well. I agree that there's something uber suspicious going on at the White House, but this picture doesn't prove anything. Sorry.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Yo Nick.......hope you're not paying that operative. He's a boob.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Wow, you gotta good eye Tiffany. I wouldn't have honed in on that had you not pointed it out.

    ReplyDelete
  11. You must have the wrong picture. That is Randy Jackson and Black Eyed Peas. I recognize Fergie from anywhere.

    ReplyDelete